Criminal Procedure - Evidence - Protecting Artists' Creative Expression (PACE Act)
Sponsor: Marlon Amprey (District 40)Committee: JudiciarySubject: Criminal Law - ProceduresStatus: Rereferred to Judicial Proceedings (as of Sep 4, 2026)
What this bill does
Official synopsis
Providing that the creative expression of a criminal defendant or juvenile respondent is not admissible against the defendant or respondent unless the court makes certain findings, subject to a certain exception; and providing that the Act does not preclude the admission of creative expression in juvenile cases for the purposes of evaluating, recommending, or ordering referral to mental health services or diversion programs.
AI analysis is off. Set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY to enable summaries, pros and cons, and questions.
Analysis reads the bill text, the fiscal note, and the witness list. It is generated by Claude and reviewed by nobody, so check the source documents before you rely on it.
Testimony (24)
MGA witness listFAV 17FavorableFWA 1Favorable with amendmentsUNF 6Unfavorable
Organizations on record
ACLU-MDFAV 1
AuthorFAV 1
Free Our ArtFAV 1
LaPolt Law, P.C.FAV 1
Maryland JudiciaryUNF 1
Recording AcademyFAV 1
