Baltimore City – Use of Highway User Revenues for Traffic Functions and Enforcement – Modification
Sponsor: Delegate PrettymanCommittee: Environment and TransportationSubject: Transportation - HighwaysStatus: Enacted under Article II, Section 17(c) of the Maryland Constitution - Chapter 592 (as of Nov 15, 2022)
What this bill does
Official synopsis
Altering a certain limitation applicable to Baltimore City relating to the use of highway user revenues to pay or finance costs incurred for carrying out traffic functions and enforcing traffic laws; and authorizing Kent County to use highway user revenues for costs incurred by its police department for carrying out traffic functions and enforcing the traffic laws.
AI analysis is off. Set ANTHROPIC_API_KEY to enable summaries, pros and cons, and questions.
Analysis reads the bill text, the fiscal note, and the witness list. It is generated by Claude and reviewed by nobody, so check the source documents before you rely on it.
Testimony (3)
MGA witness listFAV 2FavorableUNF 1Unfavorable
| Position | Witness | Organization | Testimony |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAV | Mehu, Natashalobbyist | Mayor's Office of Government Relations | Oral + Written (PDF) |
| FAV | Delegate Prettyman, Delegate Prettymanlegislator | Individual | Oral + Written (PDF) |
| UNF | Pennington, Anthony | Individual | Position only |
Organizations on record
Registered lobbyists who testified
FAVMehu, NatashaMayor's Office of Government RelationsRegistered for: Maryland Hospital Association; Maryland Patient Care and Access Coalition; Maryland Association of Certified Public Accountants; Maryland Academy of Advanced Practice Clinicians; Baltimore Washington Rapid Rail, LLC; Maryland Works, Inc.…